Wednesday, March 10, 2010

The Earth Machine

Throughout the mysteries and dynamic encumbrances of life, humanity has triumphed over a self-sustaining planet. We have managed to enslave planet Earth to do our bidding. The list of duties goes on and on as we pressure it to provide us with water, dirt, oil, fruits, vegetables, animals, land, trees and many more seemingly inexhaustible supplies. The Earth being a mother above all other things treats humans with respect, dignity and provides without judgment or question. The sons and daughters of Earth in their own respect, and much like impolite child simply takes and takes, giving very little back. One should perhaps think, when enough is enough?

If we were to simply take a moment and look back at this collective history, there are congruent themes that consistently appear within human life. We’ll take the very base thematic of those who have power, those who want power and those attaining power. There has always been an innate struggle to strive for this. Throughout our history without naming specific examples, there always seems to be one group of humans that believe themselves so righteous and proper that they have to destructively transform others into the ‘right’ way of doing things.

Nationalism comes to mind. Isn’t a state defined by its popular ideology? The unification of outward single thought process, while keeping originality and abstract thinking within the confines of the skull. It is outwardly encouraged to be original while that very same suggestion is suffocated from within. This majority rules thematic has been the very cause of much of the world’s discontent. Our jails, asylums, rehabilitation centers, educational facilities, churches, hospitals and so on are ways to keep things in line by placing those citizens that fall outside of popular ideology in for a reboot. It is in a sense, a mechanized process that is void of any organic human respect. A few who hold power, wield to transform others with it. This endless quest for power has led humanity to develop selective deaf and blindness toward key issues. We seek power in whatever form we can attain it and will step on whatever stands in our way. This idea has led humans to stray from the natural environment towards an automated, self-standing existence.

Our world now reflects time management to get the most productivity out of our days. It reflects detached workers that rather confide in machines than their fellow neighbor. A society where the ultimate goal is to increase the number of zeros on the piece of paper one gets bi-weekly to congratulate them for their labors. Where happiness can only be attained at the end of the work cycle through the boredom of retirement.

The mechanical world, in which we live in now, is represented by the ice-cold machines that have replaced the jobs of humans, under the banner of making things easier to manage and produce.

Sounds great, doesn’t it?

The question here is simply the following. What has pushed humanity from a rooted Agrarian society to a travel to the moon and beyond society? In a more natural perspective, human life, much like trees, were at one point rooted to the earth. Humans used the materials around them and that was that. If they did not have oranges in their general area, they did not import them from half around the world. Through exploration, humans traveled outside of their villages to search, hunt and investigate. Through this measure human society expanded and integrated themselves with Earth’s other inhabitants. There was tranquility within the satisfaction of simply ‘being.’ Shortly after, science makes an entrance and begins its contamination within human thought. All of sudden, the process behind all things is important to us. Humans begin to look at the logical explanation to a world better felt within our hearts rather than with out brains. And slowly, as the world is broken down, categorized and placed within the boundaries and limitations of definition, things begin to complicate themselves. Before, when a human that figured out to grow crops would plant them, they would place their faith either in the Earth itself, or perhaps in God. Back then, we didn’t know, or perhaps didn’t care about the genetic structure of a seed. We simply trusted that this thing, once placed into the ground would produce what we expected. The whole process was magical and glorious. Through science, we now know why this process happens. We can logically base our assumptions within an estimation backed by supposed facts. It is a mechanized process void of faith, surprise and belief.

Some will call on science as an evolution. For the sake of this argument, let us call upon Darwin’s theory of evolution. Humans, some not all, will identify this theory as truth in some cases. Placing the word evolution aside, the transition from monkey to man is simply a change. There was nothing wrong with the monkey prior to this change. It is simply something different, a new form of life so to speak. Science in the same respect is not an evolution either, it is merely a different view of the world. The introduction of science does not mean that the perspective of looking at the through a natural lens should be abandoned.

So why has it?

We go back to nationalism and it’s general push to get citizens on their page.

We have a choice in the matter, though it might seem that doing so would mean going against the grain.

Knowing too much is a crutch in many respects. Let’s take the example of the film, ‘The Gods must be Crazy’ in which a bushman living outside of the restraints of the modern world is introduced to an empty glass bottle of coke. Never having seen this object before causes him and his village major problems. Technology here is seen as a great evil with no place in the bushman’s natural world. The film will go and show us a contrast between the complexity of the modern world versus the simplistic nature of societies were ages ago. At first glance, it’s nearly impossible to view this comparison free of our inherit judgments. But, for as unnatural as the world of the bushman seems to the person sitting in traffic in his/her brand new car, the bushman would look at the pre-described scenario as unnatural aswell. It is all a matter of perspective. The things we do, are the things we do. We do them because within our environment, it is natural, nothing more and nothing less. It is for the individual to decide what he/she does with their lives. But within that same respect, we must keep in mind that the world, whether it is the fading natural one or the mechanical one, there are natural rules at play here.

The rules are quite identical across the board.

The world simply asks us for common respect. If we are to give this common respect to the Earth, humans, animals, food and even machines, things would go a lot smoother.

For a moment, lets forget about economics. Let’s forget about it because does it really make sense to steal the natural resources of our planet to turn around and sell them? If the money humans gain from the selling oil for example, is used to by a car, what good is that car when there is no more land to drive it on?

Numbers are mechanical and are very much a representation of how the world has become automated so to speak. Dates, currency, years, hours are all a form of logical measurement. Humans live their lives on the clock, punching in and punching out.

So, is it a mechanical world or natural one?

From what I’ve learned thus far, a marriage of both at this point is the only way for true change to take place. Returning to our roots with machine guns is not really the answer without applying the natural rules of things.

Treat others like you would be treated and the world will turn a lot smoother. Then and only then can we truly find this so called human evolution.

Then, and only then.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Chasing the Same Tails (Tales)

Globalization is now the new market in which capitalist pirates can seize the new economic boom. Since the world seems to work around money, and the goal of attaining more of it, our true purpose has been slighted by this misrepresented concept.

He who has the most numbers wins?

I don’t think so.

We must simply begin to question the very ideas that are presented to us by our fellow mainstream innovators. Why push globalization now? Why not one thousand years ago? Why are we even counting years to begin with? As a human, we are connected to everything around us through emotional strings, strings we are obviously not using. What we feel is very real, even though we have been taught to not trust our feelings and seek advice from so called experts. Feeling is an organic and natural process that has always been with us. If we feel the heart of others our connections to those people will never be severed. But it’s scary to feel isn’t it? Lets think about it this way, when we are born, we are told that one day, past the great question mark of life, we will grow old and die. A malicious factor that has been taken as fact that inhibits us from feeling.

I can love my neighbor, but only 75%. The reason being is that if I love my neighbor a full 100% I risk getting hurt because one day he/she might leave or die. So I limit my love for thy neighbor and for myself. I find that I have created an invisible cage around myself and my heart. I find myself destroying the very thing that makes me, me…. my feelings and emotions that fuel my very existence. If I am the creator of my reality, then all things are a matter of my choosing.

Inevitably, death is a choice.

We rely on the internet, cell phones, email, telegrams and other such devices simply because we are afraid of an emotionally connected relationship. What these devices do for us, we have always been able to do through our hearts and minds, our very own organic technology. Globalization has been around even before the word was invented, the modem our minds, the power our hearts.

So why is it that we are now only talking about this global unity, and only now noticing that most of the world works on a mechanical reaction to the things around us? Perhaps the church has the answer? Perhaps the Psychologist that works within certain measures of nationalism will know? The fact of the matter is that it is placed in our path now because someone perhaps is banking on it, maybe not. The idea here is to recreate the World as we know it as creators. Government and its multiple political smiles are a falsehood of special interests that sustain economic gains. We live our lives thinking that we have limited choices: choices such as having a vanilla milkshake or a chocolate one, large fries or onion rings, a three-bedroom house or a four-bedroom one.

There’s a lot more than just that, and I am not simply speaking about a choice in car colors or the coffin that you’ll be buried in one day. I am speaking about the choice of immortality, the choice to change the world and the choice to truly feel the emotions that we have suppressed for most of our lives.

We have a choice in all matters.

Humans have tried to reconstruct the tools they have already possessed through structures and technology, in the name of advancement. The further we venture passed our true origins the greater the divide becomes. Not only does our world become more mechanical, but so do our responses and feelings to that mechanical monster.

What can we do?

There is not one community out there, authority, specialist that would know you better than you would know your self. You live with yourself 365 days a year, 24 hours a day and so on. You are aware of every change, of every thought and every evolution you go through. Based on this truth, logically it is impossible for a doctor or a psychologist that meets you for 5 minutes to know more about you than you already know.

It is time to give credit to where credit is due.

Time to start fully trusting yourself and take responsibilities towards the world around you.

These ideas such as global unity can serve for a great conversation over coffee but can easily die with the last sugar packet.

It is simply time to connect not through internet or mobile phones… but to connect with the emotions that can and will surpass the mechanistic society which we have created for the sake of advancement. Advancement we’ve been equipped with since day one.

Monday, February 1, 2010

Gods and the Madness of the Human Condition

The Gods Must Be Crazy, a film directed by South African born Jamie Uys is an allegorical journey of how drastically unnatural our technology has become. The film in its essence is a story about discovery and how the world has steered from its natural origin.

The story starts with the introduction of the natives, the Bushmen or Sans people of the Kalahari. These natives survive in the Kalahari as hunter-gatherers. The Bushmen also survive picking wild berries and other methods of gathering water and such. One day, the pilot of a passing plane decides that after drinking a thirst quenching ‘Coke’ it’s better to throw it out the window than recycling it. This empty bottle of ‘Coke’ becomes the trigger reaction to one mans epic journey of curiosity and discovery.

Like who have seen this particular film, the story is self-explanatory. It draws a comparison between technically advanced civilizations and the non-technically advanced civilizations. At first thought one would immediately think that a civilization that has not been introduced to technology would be backwards. But is that truly the case? For example, giving a person of lesser intelligence a wrist watch that can calculate the most complex math within seconds, tell you your exact location in the world and even tell you the perceptual calibrations of the sun does not necessarily make this person smarter or by any means more advanced than the next. In fact, the chance that this technology is actually used for its intended purpose is slim. Imagine a baby being sat down with no one around to explain to them what a ‘jack-in-the-box’ is supposed to do. This baby would sit down and investigate the box, pound on it, shake it and throw it. As the baby builds his/her understanding of what this mysterious box is without prior explanation, something wonderful happens….

They form their own reality of what the use and purpose of this box actually is. What if they eventually discover the handle and begin to turn it? A few seconds of careful turning would reveal this painted figure popping out of the box at the baby.

What then?

The baby, following his/her natural inclination will make a self-determining judgment as to what this thing truly is. It will decide whether it is evil, good or neutral. This process is by far more interesting. I mean, lets think about it. From the moment that the human being is launched into this layer of reality, he/she is told what things are and what these things do. It is in fact a matter of suggestive perceptions that construct most human’s lives. These suggestions, being simply suggestions are taken as fact without question. Others give us the unwanted gift of their limitations. We simply take them as truth and never question them.

Everything is multi-dimensional.

Now, technology necessarily does not make situations better. In many ways, technology takes what already has a natural structure and dismantles it hoping that in the reconstruction of such a structure it can make it better.

Hope is nice and essential, but if a society or thought is not broken why would it need to be fixed? This ironically is the main problem with technology and forced advancement (evolution for the sake of evolution).

The bottle (technology) when introduced to the Sans people is welcomed at first. However, eventually this technology brings the Sans people a particular sense of disruption in the form of jealousy and anger. The bottle is then viewed as a great evil and is taken from the village to be destroyed.

Much like the baby analyzing the jack-in-the-box, the Sans people, void of any suggestive measure interpreted the bottle as something they did not need nor want.

Wouldn’t it be nice if we could simply make decisions on our own natural inclination versus the forced inclination of others?

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

“The Progression of Human Thought in the 50’s and 60’s”


Spiraling through World War I and II, the United States of America found themselves in a silent war filled with threats, espionage and a race to establish themselves as a superior world power. The Cold War all on it’s own engaged the US to begin a forward thought process that would eventually open their awareness to think outside of the proverbial box. The Cold War was a global scenario that pushed the multinational citizens of Earth to reconsider their approach and overall view of life. Lets think of it this way, World War II, was quite straightforward in terms of categorizing the bad guys from the good guys. The Allied forces were seen in its majority as the good guys and the Axis powers were seen as the bad guys. There was an overall air that the collected nations stood against Germany in their advance of achieving world domination. The thinking at this point was very straight forward even in terms of how the enemy would attack and what strategies would be used to thwart their efforts. Upon Germany’s defeat, the world found itself in the clutches of the Cold War, allies soon turned into enemies and the methodology of how to implement and execute a silent war went into effect, and thus human awareness began to escalate and build. This catalyst began in 1945, would be the encouraged the worlds people to think about their circumstances a little differently.

1955 introduced the world to Herbert Marcuse’s work entitled Eros and Civilization. This book, fundamentally is a logical marriage between the philosophies introduced by Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. 1 The composition argues that the very nature of capitalism is an instrument that is used to prevent society from reaching its expected non-repressive plateau. Marcuse states that there is a defined struggle between what is known as human instinct (common sense) and the repressive nature of social standpoint. 1 The breakdown of our society in the eyes of Marcuse is as follows; there is a major conflict between workers and the capitalists that put them to work. 1 The problem has and always will remain within the philosophical practices of capitalism. However, this idea of capitalism has many forms, one of them being the idea of a segregated United States. African Americans for a long time were simply viewed as labor and nothing more. Within this viewpoint, African Americans were often viewed as instruments rather than human beings; expendable and for the most part inferior to their capitalist masters. Repression is part of histories repetitive cycles, but within the stage of the 50’s and 60’s it was one that would be challenged and ultimately changed.

Coincidentally, the American Civil Rights Movement began in 1955. African Americans introduced the fight for equality through non-violent means. On it’s own, the choice to express their discontent in a peaceful fashion perhaps confused the White segregationists that probably expected a violent rebellion. The White segregationists were most likely prepared to fight off the rebellion of their slaves using guns and violence were bested with a rebellion based on intellect and strategy. African Americans and their leaders used demonstrations such as boycotts, marches, speeches and a general attack on the flaws of the very system of America and the illusion of its freedom. As the human expansion continued, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned discrimination within areas of public accommodations and employment. 2 The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was followed by the Voting Rights Act and the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965. 2

White segregationists saw the world as equal and fair before the American Civil Rights movement began. Their perspective of the reality that surrounded them was one justified by what they perceived the truth to be. However, as the saying goes, there are two sides to every coin, and the African American side of this particular coin did not share the same perspective.

Change was needed.

In order to expand, change is required. Without change, a human being cannot hope to expand and learn. Without change, a stagnation of life occurs. While change is always thought about and mentally welcomed, the true motion of change is often repelled. 3 This primarily deals with Human comfort zones and how we will do everything in our power to remain within them. An all out war between the United States and the USSR would have easily answered the question of who was more powerful in a faster manner. The same can be said about the White segregationists and the African Americans involved with the Civil Rights Movement. However, while violence would have declared a victor faster, the time period of the 50’s and 60’s promoted a different type of wind. The world hot off the hells of World War II required a different approach to the presented problems. The world was unknowingly developing a multi-angled view of the world and of life itself.

After being involved with the Vietnam War for 3-years of endless battles, 1968 introduced the American’s to North Vietnam’s Tet Offensive. On January 31st, the Tet Offensive took place and was a major turning point in the Vietnam war. The day was declared to be a cease fire due to a national holiday. However, things did not go exactly as planned when the North Vietnamese commenced the unexpected attack. It demonstrated to the US that the so-called enemies were not only well equipped, but also far smarter than the US had anticipated. The affect of this attack was not in the actual physical fight, but rather the involvement of the media throughout this matter. For the first time ever, families in the United States had the privilege of watching slaughtered bodies on prime time television. Thousands of families watched as the bodies of dead soldiers from both sides of the lines were seen and presented to a public audience. In a way, the North Vietnamese won the war because of the outcome that ensued after the offensive. For the first time, the war was real and President Johnson was then faced with a very unhappy American public. 4 Ho Chi Minh, the leader of the North Vietnamese forces, was a misunderstood countryman that within his justification, wanted the French out of Vietnam in order for the Vietnamese to lead the country themselves. 5 Ho Chi Minh was well aware of the political and social dilemmas within the US during this time period. The information highway of the time was television, and through television the American public was swayed to turn against their own government, as they rallied for the troops to come back home.

Information is power.

Within the United States, the justification for the war was to suppress communism. This was the main idea for the US, to stop the red threat. That’s why the USA joined France against the North Vietnamese. It is the same reason, why the US was involved in the Korean War, and why they stood against the small country of Cuba. They were fighting the red spread. If one looks at the Communist Manifesto by Marx, it strictly states the perfect conditions for a true communist state. A country that is ripe for communism is one that the middle class holds the majority of power within an industrialized state. 6 The process of industrialization took Europe almost 150 years to achieve within its own Industrial Revolution. 7 These other countries that claimed communism, China, North Vietnam, USSR and Cuba were in reality using a version of communism that they adapted to their own construct. While the seeds were dropped, the cultivation of such a system would never truly reach its true form. However, such an understanding could only be realized by stepping in the shoes of another, something perhaps that the US was not entirely ready for, or was it?

2001 a space odyssey was a film directed by the great Stanley Kubrick, which depicted the ascension of man through the known world and into the unknown space around us. The film was released in 1968 and marked an eye-opening spectacle of the senses. Before this, there was nothing quite like it. This film exercised the thematic of this time period perfectly, the exploration of the new. Art represents life and life is represented within art. As the space race continued within the frostbite of the Cold War, the Americans, very anxious to beat the USSR to the moon launched their Apollo 8 shuttle, which was the first manned vessel to leave the gravitational pull of the Earth. 8 Life representing art and art representing life took on a whole new meaning. The base mechanics of the Cold War and the achievements of the US thematically relied on establishing the undeniable power of one country over another.

This time period was one filled with questions. Black Panthers alongside Hippies questioned the systematic structure of US society and politics. In a book written by Alan Watts entitled ‘The Book on the Taboo Against knowing Who You Are’, he illustrates that the very nature of man is one based on the conflict between the illusion of the self and the ego. 9 Humans are always looking for the ultimate answer to life and the question of origin. Alan Watts, who published this book in 1966, worked with the concept of the universal whole. The universal whole is an idea that consists that everything in existence is interconnected and is actually one in the same. It provides one with an unannounced respect for all things around us and within us. The idea developed within Watts book, is one that encapsulates the signs of the time. In this irrevocable understanding, ego is the true enemy. Lets look at this theory within the construct of the Cold War. If this philosophy were to be introduced to that scenario, the US and the USSR would see that they are a part of one planet. Within this one planet, it is better to live in harmony versus a futile attempt at demonstrating who’s more powerful. The struggle for power is a meaningless entry, but within a male modality, it is an extremely challenging detail to change. 3

This era in American History is the catalyst for everything that is experienced in modern day. It shows how innovative human thought has become in comparison to the 50’s and 60’s. It is a growth within itself not only intellectually, but spiritually as well. The thematic of being part of a whole is one that is still exercised in many circles today. It is what the Civil Rights Movement was fighting for, what the North Vietnamese were trying to express and one that is still an important aspect in human life today. If we truly saw ourselves as a sum of whole, which is simply divided into different aspects, we would be able to truly live within a harmonious understanding. But the seeds planted back then are still being cultivated today. Much like it was back then, patience and the understanding of the different perceptions and justifications with our world are very much needed and in full effect.


“Cutting Through Health” - The Effects of Male and Female Modalities on its Patients



It was a beautiful near perfect day. A boy by the name of Steven was riding his bike along with two of his friends, a girl named Alice and another boy. The smell in the air stamped the day with a peculiar odor. The trio passed through the comforting shades of residential streets into the sun beaten roads that spill into the overcrowded beaches. Taking a shortcut down an empty construction site, they felt the sea breeze against their faces as they hurried to reach the water. Quickly tired from the rush, the trio stopped for a small, momentary break. Suddenly, as if out of nowhere, a car speeding through the supposed empty lot was heading straight towards them. Steven, with seconds to spare pushed Alice out of the way of the car and took the hit to save her. The car, which was later discovered to have been going over 55 mph smashed against Steven. Upon impact, Steven flew into the air and smashed the left side of his head against a concrete pole and fell to the ground. 1 This moment, lasted forever. The other boy, quickly rushed over to Steven as did Alice to check their friend. Steven felt no pain. The shock of the accident immediately sent him into a state of numbness. His body was practically destroyed. Alice, crying over the body of her friend, thanked him over and over for his sacrifice. The other boy called the 911 and pleaded for help. Steven smiled and kept asking Alice if she was okay. Eventually, Steven closed his eyes and the world he knew and loved, disappeared. 3

On the way to the hospital he died twice. 1

Steven was taken to the trauma center of a Hospital, in which he had the second highest number of tubes (10) inserted within a human body and survived, the leader having 11 for the purposes of draining, feeding and respiration. 1 During his subsequent 9-month coma, he received slight physical therapy at the persistence of his mother, who found herself visiting her son everyday. The Doctors wrote him off and moved on, but his mother did not. Her patience brought her to see her son emerge from the coma. As bittersweet poetry goes, Steven immediately asked if Alice was safe, not knowing how much time had truly passed. Steven’s mother, overjoyed to see her son’s eyes open once again, knew that the hardest part was still ahead of him. The moment of joy transitioned into a dark new reality, from what he had remembered. His friend Alice, tired of waiting for Steven to wake up, moved away and forgot about him. The other boy did the same. If it weren’t for his mother, the world would have seemingly forgotten the heroic actions of this boy. Steven had lost the ability to stand or walk. In addition, he lost his basic gross and fine motor skills from the left side of his body, experienced atrophy, memory loss, constant tremors, moodiness, depression, and other difficulties associated with overall brain damage. Steven had reached the proverbial rock bottom and only had the long, desolate road of recovery ahead of him. 1

Steven’s road to recovery had many obstructions. The first and most powerful obstacle was the very healthcare system that had brought him back to life. Typically, traditional western Hospitals are dominated by a male modality and philosophy. This method consists of a rough and detached mentality that deliberately relies on the techniques of hunting the problem, cutting, and extraction of the problem. Steven went through a series of different Doctors during this ordeal. Just to name a few, he saw a Podiatric Surgeon, Neurologist, Orthopedic Surgeon, Family Primary Care Physicians and many others. All who diagnosed Steven concurred that he had reached maximum medical improvement.

Early in our recorded history, there was man and woman. The need to survive through the consumption of the things around us was dominant. Men, were responsible for exploring the world around them. As men explored, they hunted and extracted their prey from the natural world in order to bring the game back to their villages to consume. Man kills and dominates nature. This practice of hunting and extracting never really stopped for men, it simply evolved. The hunter-extraction methods were adapted to mostly all industries in which man is involved. We can see heavy practice of these methods within the western medical industry. There is a patient expressing symptoms, the Doctor addresses the symptoms and hunts down the infection or the cause of the symptom. From there, the cause of whatever ails the patient is extracted, burnt, cut out and blasted away through the use of pills, injections or surgery. The male modality of healthcare does not truly care for the patient itself. It simply cares for the self-serving achievement of the conquest. 2 If the Doctor is successful, then he/she is praised in some fashion. If the Doctor fails, then he/she denounces the patient as incurable. The male modality is cold and uncaring. It does not express the emotions of the heart. Take for instance something called bedside manners. In the case study of Steven and his accident, the mother expressed that the bedside manners of some of the Doctor’s were poor, as they constantly spoke about him in third person and often making statement about how he would never recover. 1 A Doctor in western society is placed on a pretty high authoritative level. Usually, most think that the Doctor’s words are final. With this being the case, wouldn’t the most important and critical factor in recovery be the bedside manner of the physician? Think about this through the eyes of a child. You develop a cold and begin to feel horrible. Dad walks in the room and tells you to buckle up and sweat it out, while mom brings you a cup of hot soup, brushes your hair and hugs you. Dad leaves to work and mom stays with you throughout the day to make sure you get better.

A typical dad simply might not get it. The child, much like the patient needs attention. They need to be supported and reinforced, not reprimanded and broken down.

Steven, was reprimanded and broken down. Throughout his time in the hospital, he was told that he would never walk again and would live the rest of his life partially alive so to speak. 1 The bedside manner expressed by the Doctors towards Steven psychologically impacted him in ways that the Doctors themselves would never know. Their words and lack of support were planted within Steven’s mind and began to sprout roots. Steven constantly expressed to his mom and his physical therapists that he would never be able to walk or be normal. When asked where he got these ideas from, he responded that the Doctors told him so and that they were always right. 3

Seven years later, Steven’s toes began curling up due to lack of movement, giving him great discomfort in his legs and feet. Steven’s Podiatric surgeon proposed to make multiple slices in his Achilles tendon hoping to achieve a greater range in motion and insert steel rods into his toes in order to permanently straighten them out. 1

Before Steven’s proposed operation, there were some sampled concerns over his deepening state of depression. He was then referred over to Dr. Justin Newman of the Banyan Institutes, a licensed physician who specializes in holistic healthcare, using methods such as acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine. Dr. Newman, proposed that through the use of acupuncture and other holistic techniques, he could not only improve Steven’s mental state, but also help with the overall circulation of Steven’s body. At this point, Dr. Newman was the only one who told Steven that there was hope. Most of the sessions with Steven involved conversations about daily things, like television, world events, and wrestling, in order to focus on other aspects and not just on the problem. During Steven’s treatments with Dr. Newman, a startling thing began to happen. Not only was Steven’s mental state improving, but his physical body was also recovering as well. 1 To note, the method that was initiated was a female modality. It was a caring engagement filled with possibilities, rather than the male modality used throughout his stay at the hospitals that all led to cold dead ends.

Early in our recorded history, there was man and woman. The need to survive through the consumption of the things around us was dominant. Women, were responsible for the care of the young and the maintenance of the village. As women harvested and cared for the natural world around them, they established a harmonious understanding with nature and it’s inhabitants. The job of women was to create life through birth and nurture the world that men explored. The 10-months of pregnancy that a woman encounters, gives her a particular intuitive respect for life as she practices patience and understanding of not only her body, but of the life she now carries within her. This caregiver method, much like its counterpart, also evolved and found a restful place within the various industries of the modern world. We can see the practice of these methods within the western medical industry through its nurses. 2

For example, there is a patient expressing a symptom. While the Doctor hunts down the symptom through pre-formulated systematic methods, the nurse, which is a role that fundamentally exercises the thematics of the female modality, engages the patient in conversation and stays with the patient long after the Doctor leaves the hospital. The female modality is warm and caring. However, because the nurse is not seen as authoritative as the Doctor, many of the nurse’s efforts are often times crushed by the Doctor’s diagnoses of the patient. The female modality is essential to proper recovery. Once again. think about this through the eyes of a child. You develop a cold and begin to feel horrible. Who would you want to care for you? 2

Seven years after Steven’s accident and of being treated under the male modality of healthcare, Steven began treatment under a female modality of healthcare. Steven’s treatment while under the care of the Banyan staff was conducted in parts. The first area of focus was to stabilize his mental health and reduce the tremors he was experiencing. After that, the treatments focused on Steven’s core (center of his abdomen) in order to build strength enough for him to stand. 1 Though western Doctors concluded that Steven would never walk or stand again, Dr. Newman felt otherwise. Within a two-year span, of just being treated with Acupuncture, Steven was able to stand and take few steps, an amazing feat by any measure considering his prognosis indicated that he would never walk or stand again. 1 Now three years into his treatment, Dr. Newman and myself, have been seeing Steven on a weekly basis. His ability to stand and walk has greatly improved. Currently, the focus of his treatment is to establish his own independent living skills. He was 16-years of age when the accident occurred and left him with a lack of basic gross and fine motor skills on his left side, atrophy, memory loss, tremors, moodiness, depression and severe brain damage. For the first seven years of his recovery process under the male modality of healthcare there was simply no real recovery. Seven years after the accident he was introduced to the Banyan Institutes offering a female modality of healthcare where a true sense of recovery took place. Barely under 3-years of treatment at the Banyan, Steven had regained his ability to stand and walk, regained his basic motor functions on his left side, improved his memory, reduced the tremors, and established solid sense of humor towards life. My work with Steven under the methodology of Meditative Therapy, accessed the roots of the accident. Why he thought he would never walk again and why? Reassessing these prescribed determinations, is key to a full recovery for Steven. In earlier sessions, Steven was unable to visualize himself walking, standing or running. After about one-month, he was able to see himself walking, running and standing. 1 Since he began to believe this possible reality in his mind, his actual standing and walking strengthened by leaps and bounds. This is similar to the approach taken by professional athletes who for example, visualize the perfect dive, the perfect free throw, or that proverbial hole-in-one. The brain and nervous system do not distinguish between actual walking and imagined walking, it simply responds accordingly.

It is important to understand what truly happened in Steven’s case and the modalities used and how they affected his recovery process. Firstly, a male modality is a system much like the female modality is. It has nothing to do with actual gender other than the origin of the modality. A woman Doctor is as prone to follow a male modality of healthcare as much as a man. It stems from the classical training given to these people throughout their education. As say a male nurse is more inclined to a female modality of healthcare as much as a woman is. It’s all in the education prior to the actual practice. In Steven’s case, he was exposed to the cold hard world of textual fact, which by default is limited by logic. It is heartless and void of emotion. Steven was hit by a car and smashed against a concrete post. The Doctors under this particular belief structure saw the hard reality in front of them and wrote him off as never being able to fully recovering. They immediately limited Steven through their own belief and educational structure. When Steven was introduced to the Banyan, he was also introduced to the first set of people that told him there was hope. It is not that one modality of healthcare is better than the other. It is the attitude that makes the difference. The Banyan told Steven “yes”, while the hospital’s told Steven “no”. One limited him while the encouraged him to spread his wings and fly. That is the main reason why Steven was able to recover while under the Banyan’s care. Other reasons are attributed to the practices of the expressed modalities. The male modality exercised within the hospitals are invasive and uncaring, while the female modality is non-invasive. The proof is in the actions conducted while Steven was recovering. Just taking the example of the Podiatric surgeon that wanted to slice up Steven’s Achilles tendon and install steel rods to straighten out his feet while still embracing his limitation to never stand again, versus a series of minimally invasive. Acupuncture needles that ultimately enabled him to stand and later walk. Though it is hard to see Steven’s perspective on the matter, one can remotely access that one procedure might be more uncomfortable than the other. One has an immediate outcome (steel rods) while the other is based on patience and the will of the patient. 1

I propose a marriage of both modalities. Much like the concepts of Yin and Yang that rightfully declare balance of all things, the same goes for the male and female modalities of healthcare. When, Steven was hit by the car ten years ago, Acupuncture needles would have done very little in his favor. The need to enter a western healthcare facility was unavoidable. There, he was reconstructed so to speak. However, the limitations the Doctors placed on him were a negative note to his recovery process. By the time I was able to see Steven under the practice of Meditative Therapy, he had heard the word “no” too many times. The amount of time it took to uncover the possibility of “yes” took a long time, and in many respects is still a focal point in Steven’s recovery process. What if Steven would have been told yes from the very beginning? Perhaps instead of ten years, he would regain his ability to stand and walk in five years.

What if Steven was never introduced to the Banyan Institutes and their Holistic methods based on a female modality? What would have happened to Steven at that point? It is important to view Steven’s case in particular with “what ifs”. Within the care of the male-based modality of western healthcare, it can be concluded that Steven would not have made as much progress, if any at all. He would have never walked or let alone stand. Steven would have endured countless of surgeries not limited to inserting steel rods in his toes to keep them perpetually straight. A marriage between male and female modalities within the healthcare industry is necessary to guard against the potential “what ifs”, to secure that both patients such as Steven and future cases are handled properly and not simply thrown into the air for chance to care them.



Endnotes

1 Newman, Dr. Justin. Escandon, Robert J. “Banyan Medical Archives.” 2007 - 2009.

2 Dr. Joe Holland. “Male and Female Modalities in Healthcare.” (lecture on male and

female modalities, Miami, Florida, 2009).

3 Perkins, Steven. Personal INTERVIEW. 5th November 2009.

Friday, October 16, 2009

The Creator Creates - Philosophy

Existence is an ironic twist of metal, flesh and concrete. Human beings have steered further and further away from the organic roots that once made the world turn. The world now turns with machines, money, laboratories and chemicals. As humans venture towards this constantly expanding verse, they turn towards the ultimate artistic canvas, the creation of human beings through non-natural means. The concept of human dignity and equality is a drowning effect in a world where humans are identified through id badges and numbers. Not too long ago, though the existence of time is debatable, African Americans pushed through a Civil Rights Movement throughout the 50’s and 60’s that is very much relevant today. The new human movement is not so much to attain civil rights, as much as it is to attain and understand a profound sense of universal and planetary respect for life. As human beings constantly seek for truth, they come across many tests of ethical morality. Sometimes they pass with flying colors, and sometimes they fail hard. Of course, let it be understood that passing and/or failing is an abstract concept, much like our very own existence. There is something always to learn whether pass or fail. Human history illustrates a series of circular conditions carrying the thematics of equality and the struggle to reach such a thing. Our modern world will tell us that not everyone is equal. Our media will also tell us that some of us are meant for greatness while others should be disposed of through systematic killing. The dignity of human life and its preservation seems to always be in some sort of peril. If superheroes existed (and I’m not saying they don’t), their battles would be against scientists, doctors, insurance companies, corporations and some of the very humans they are sworn to protect. The very things humans create are ironically the very things that endanger them.

Eugenics anyone?

A quick definition of Eugenics will tell us that the selective breeding, when being directly applied to humans is a function to improve the species. Through our microscopes and Bunsen burners, we can see new possibilities in playing God within the universe of genes and atoms. Perhaps through cloning and genetic manipulation, humans can create a new and improved version of themselves. Perhaps, if taken globally, we can create a new class of soldier, genetically modified to be faster, stronger and endure pain in a logical manner. Think of the possibilities. Through the concept of Eugenics, humans can create improved classes of clones that can clean for us, cook for us, work for us, a class that would never become sick and so on. If one were to simply think of this concept, one can’t help but to trace this idea back to genocide. Perhaps it’s a stretch, but we can also excuse those citizens that aren’t up par and systematically kill them as well?

Utilitarian beliefs will lead us to understand that the worth of an action morally, can only be measured by the outcome of such an action. Meaning that if killing one, will save one hundred, that life is worth less than those of the others. This is a fine and accepted concept, as long as you are not that one individual being sacrificed in the name of others. How can one life be put on a scale and weighed for its worth? Aren’t all humans microcosmically connected through the stream of life? If this idea is so, then even a murderer is necessary for those who need such a thing in their lives. That means, that the mentally retarded, the lazy, the uninspired, the rude, the hopeless all play a part within the collected lives of humans and non-humans alike. The thing we do to animals and trees is the thing we will begin to do to the copies of ourselves. Eventually, Clones will be manufactured to serve as the obedient socio-economic class known as slaves.

Haven't we seen this cycle before?

What happened to the golden rule of universal ethics?

There are various philosophical theories that excuse universal ethics all together. The skeptic, who is wary of all things that have not been branded into their unconscious minds, is a good beginning example. Skepticism in practice will portray all given in information as questionable. This on it’s own account is good and bad. It’s not so great when new, potentially dangerous solutions are applied to existing problems. These particular thinkers will question the very value of the presented solution. Skepticism anchors us when historic information is presented that may shed a light into the grand human mystery of origin per se. This on it’s own is the doctrine that does not embrace true knowledge. In fact is a doctrine of constant doubt. Relativism, another set of philosophical theories will tell us that decisions, thoughts and actions are relative. This will propel us towards a particular line of thinking that states that there is no absolute truth. The truth is relative from person to person and from thing to thing. In this theory, which is very much absent from any Universal ethic, gives carte blanche to all human behaviors regardless of esteemed morality. It justifies all behavior pitting human beings as acting and reacting in relation to their environment and cultural upbringing. Ultimately, everyone could be right, as long as they conduct themselves relative to their environment. As we glide over the concepts of Nihilism, which at its base understanding is the theory that life is without purpose and meaning. Morality is a vague concept as it takes the extremes of skepticism and relativism in an unlikely marriage. Since it holds morality as nonexistent, it states that there are no preferred actions or proper choices. With this being said, these philosophical theories leave life empty and in much more danger than the followers of such concepts would believe.

We’ll circle back to Utilitarianism, which places the true moral worth of an action by its outcome. Leaving scenarios like killing one to save one hundred as an open play so to speak. Accompanying Utilitarianism, we find Formalism, which on its own account limits outside perspective when looking at particular fields of study. For example, a Formalist sees a painting as having no real meaning beyond the intent of its creator.

Limiting isn’t it?

Voluntarism states that the very will of an individual is and should be the only driving force in ones life. While this in terms of open freedom is much more inclined to view the universe through ones own will. But isn’t this on its own account an entrapment within the aspect of limited perspective? If one is guided by their will, and their will alone without the application of the ‘golden rule’, one is found once again making decisions based on their belief system, their moral etiquette within their relative existence.

What about Natural Law?

The philosophy of natural law will dictate that the world naturally has certain inclinations. Through those natural inclinations our world sees definition. Natural law, within the doctrine of the Catholic Church holds the views set forth by their model teacher, Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas organized that humans crave social structure. They naturally want to be accepted by others and strive to live amongst identifiable points of reference. Aristotle, being a great inspiration to Aquinas, saw man-made cities as living organisms. Much like humans, the very cities they live in are very much alive, forever evolving and moving forward. Through the concept of objective reality, truths are objectively discovered rather than simply created.

This concept also pits us within the realm that all things, even those, which are discovered, are created in some fashion. God, in his/her all-knowing stance is simply a creation of the original thinker, is he not? Within this parameter, we can feel that a particular need for universal acceptance is needed. If we are to advance throughout the timeless linear cycles of existence a particular amount of responsibility and respect is required.

How can we enslave the very things we create?

In its timeless cycle, the master of something always becomes the slave and the slaves become the masters. Thus the cycle, while endless, is not without its perfect sense of irony. As creators, being made in the form of our own creator, we are responsible to everything around us. Our reality, though perceived through the sockets of sight is individual from person to person. Meaning, there is not simply one reality to perceive. There are many realities all layered endlessly one on top of another. Those who follow a particular philosophical doctrine are in the right place for them, while others sitting on the other side of that particular angle view them as being wrong.

Ironically, they are both right. What a person believes to be true is in fact true. Much like the concept of relativism, person’s personal truths will be a compliment to their accumulated life. The idea is to search within and find that undeniable source of universal love and appreciation for not only the things around us, but for the very love one has within their hearts.

Then, and only then can true universal respect and understanding can be attained.


Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Iraq, The Land of the Gods - History


Amidst the war and turmoil that stamps the Middle East as a hot bed of activity, we can find the rich mythology of Iraq taking a back seat. Iraq is scarcely known as the cradle of civilization. If we look back at the year 3,500 BC, Iraq was then known as Mesopotamia. Southern Mesopotamia gave birth to the worlds first complex civilization, which included the technologies of science, mathematics, cosmology, worship, economy, government, written language and architecture to name a few. Mesopotamia, whose first civilization was Sumer, is a mystery to human beings even today.

For years, the west had believed that our civilizations were directly taken from Greek and Roman cultures when in fact, it all stems from the very first civilization, Mesopotamia.

The brief history of modern Iraq is one of constant conquest and turbulence.

Once the Middle East has been settled, how will future Historians interpret the occurrences and events that are taking place within Iraq today? Within the heated mystery of the Middle Eastern desert, a question arises, why are the US troops so involved in conducting the pacification of this particular part of the world? There is a brief part of the Mesopotamian mythology that covers the God’s creation of the Human Being. Originally, according to Sumerian myth, Anu, the supreme God and Ki, the Goddess of Earth gave birth to a set of lesser Gods called Anunnaki. These lesser Gods, the Anunnaki were meant to do the daily work of the Gods, much like slaves. The Anunnaki, unsatisfied by this lesser work, demanded their own slaves to do their work for them. They assisted the greater Gods in the creation of yet another race to work the daily chores, much like slaves would. This new race was ironically the Human Race.

Funny, humans originally were created as a slave race. Which on its own account would explain a lot about the very nature of Humanity and their actions.

Eventually, much like all subordinates, the humans, much like their predecessors the Anunnaki, rebelled. After this rebellion, it is said that Human Beings lived in the cities freely, though the Anunnaki remained involved in daily human activities.

Perhaps, the resistance and tension that is felt in the Middle East today, is simply an echo of the enslavement that had occurred in Ancient Iraq years ago. Though this proposed pacification might never be attained, the fact of the matter is very apparent.

Modern day Iraq is as much a puzzle today, as it was in the days that sprang forth the complex civilization of Ancient Mesopotamia. It can be hypothesized, given the mythology of Iraq that they would fight a war of freedom against what they view as a potentially oppressive force, the United States. Perhaps modern day Iraq, reminded of their indentured origins, simply view the United States as a modern day collection of Anunnaki masters trying to once again enslave them.

Perhaps, this is the case.